From:	Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Another newbie question: Watcom or DJGPP???
Date:	Mon, 09 Dec 1996 18:51:31 -0800
Organization:	Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<32ACD033.B03@cam.org>
References:	<32AA42A7 DOT 19BB AT flash DOT net> <32AAB7C1 DOT 2B6A AT cs DOT com>
Reply-To:	tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dynappp-42.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

John M. Aldrich wrote:
 
> All development on Watcom is proprietary and not in any way > accountable
> to its users except for the corporate bottom line.  
Wadda ya mean,You actually have to PAY for using Watcom in a commercial
product?(I mean,besides what you pay for getting it)
-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' com
http://www.cam.org/~tudor 

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
     Version: 3.1
     GCS d(-)@>-- s-()>+:(+)>- a--- C+(++)>+++>$ ULC(+)@>++++
P+(+)>++++>$
     L(+)>+++++>$ E-(--)?>++ W++(++)>+++>$ N(+)@>+++ o(-)?>+
K---(----)?>-
     w(---)@>-- !O--(----)>++ !M(+)>- V--(-)?>-- PS--(-)?>+++ !PE(+)>-
     Y(+)>++>$ PGP+(++)>++++>$ t---(+++)@>+++ !5(-)>-- X++(+++)>$>++++
     R+()>+++>$ tv(+)@>++ b+(++)?>+++ DI-(--)?>--- !D(+)>+++ G++(+)@
     e-()>++++>$ h(--)?>++ !r(--)?>+++ !y(--)>+++++@
     ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

- Raw text -