From: Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Another newbie question:  Watcom or DJGPP???
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 18:51:31 -0800
Organization: Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <32ACD033.B03@cam.org>
References: <32AA42A7 DOT 19BB AT flash DOT net> <32AAB7C1 DOT 2B6A AT cs DOT com>
Reply-To: tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynappp-42.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

John M. Aldrich wrote:
 
> All development on Watcom is proprietary and not in any way > accountable
> to its users except for the corporate bottom line.  
Wadda ya mean,You actually have to PAY for using Watcom in a commercial
product?(I mean,besides what you pay for getting it)
-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' com
http://www.cam.org/~tudor 

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
     Version: 3.1
     GCS d(-)@>-- s-()>+:(+)>- a--- C+(++)>+++>$ ULC(+)@>++++
P+(+)>++++>$
     L(+)>+++++>$ E-(--)?>++ W++(++)>+++>$ N(+)@>+++ o(-)?>+
K---(----)?>-
     w(---)@>-- !O--(----)>++ !M(+)>- V--(-)?>-- PS--(-)?>+++ !PE(+)>-
     Y(+)>++>$ PGP+(++)>++++>$ t---(+++)@>+++ !5(-)>-- X++(+++)>$>++++
     R+()>+++>$ tv(+)@>++ b+(++)?>+++ DI-(--)?>--- !D(+)>+++ G++(+)@
     e-()>++++>$ h(--)?>++ !r(--)?>+++ !y(--)>+++++@
     ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------