www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Wed, 5 Jun 1996 08:41:50 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
To: | Hans-Bernhard Broeker <Broeker AT PROBLEM_WITH_INEWS_DOMAIN_FILE.> |
Cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: More buggy libm |
In-Reply-To: | <4out2n$cjs@news.rwth-aachen.de> |
Message-Id: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.960605084043.25305G-100000@is> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
On 3 Jun 1996, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote: > Summing it up, the paranoia result has almost nothing to do with the > compiler (or libm, or even OS) you used to compile it. It is only > dependent on the actual FP processing hard/software, because that's > what it was designed to check. Any other dependence would be a bug in > paranoia. Right. To test libm, one should use `elefunt' (also in the DJGPP test suite).
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |