Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 08:41:50 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <Broeker AT PROBLEM_WITH_INEWS_DOMAIN_FILE.>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: More buggy libm
In-Reply-To: <4out2n$cjs@news.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960605084043.25305G-100000@is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On 3 Jun 1996, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> Summing it up, the paranoia result has almost nothing to do with the
> compiler (or libm, or even OS) you used to compile it. It is only
> dependent on the actual FP processing hard/software, because that's
> what it was designed to check. Any other dependence would be a bug in
> paranoia.

Right.  To test libm, one should use `elefunt' (also in the DJGPP test 
suite).