Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/04/26/18:18:51
Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3173
|
From: | richard DOT young AT crc DOT doc DOT ca (Richard Young)
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: Libraries for Complex-class
|
Date: | 26 Apr 1996 12:45:42 GMT
|
Organization: | Communications Research Centre
|
Lines: | 17
|
Message-ID: | <4lqghm$bv0@crc-news.doc.ca>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | yaker.vpcs.doc.ca
|
Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
I've also had trouble moving to V2.x from V1.x and it seems that the new
complex class is a template class meaning that complexes must be declared
with their component data type (ie. Complex<double> x instead of just
simply Complex x). This is worthwhile because now I can have Complex
single precision numbers (Complex<float>). However, I'll have to change
a lot of existing software to be compatible with the complex template
class.
Is the complex template class a standard, an emerging standard or just
one of numerous implementations of the complex class. I typically do
code development in the Borland C++ IDE but I don't believe they have the
same Complex template class. This would make me reluctant to move to the
template class. I suppose I could extract the source for the complex
template class from DJGPP and include it in the Borland environment.
Are there other options?
- Raw text -