Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3173 From: richard DOT young AT crc DOT doc DOT ca (Richard Young) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Libraries for Complex-class Date: 26 Apr 1996 12:45:42 GMT Organization: Communications Research Centre Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4lqghm$bv0@crc-news.doc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: yaker.vpcs.doc.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp I've also had trouble moving to V2.x from V1.x and it seems that the new complex class is a template class meaning that complexes must be declared with their component data type (ie. Complex x instead of just simply Complex x). This is worthwhile because now I can have Complex single precision numbers (Complex). However, I'll have to change a lot of existing software to be compatible with the complex template class. Is the complex template class a standard, an emerging standard or just one of numerous implementations of the complex class. I typically do code development in the Borland C++ IDE but I don't believe they have the same Complex template class. This would make me reluctant to move to the template class. I suppose I could extract the source for the complex template class from DJGPP and include it in the Borland environment. Are there other options?