Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1806
From:	strider7 AT unm DOT edu
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ASM code & Random
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 1996 22:47:11 -0700
Organization:	University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines:	12
Message-ID:	<3146615E.376F@unm.edu>
References:	<1996Mar5 DOT 164831 AT zipi DOT fi DOT upm DOT es> <4hn17p$bfs AT lyra DOT csx DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <4hnjl1$1l0 AT mack DOT rt66 DOT com> <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960310091342 DOT 26365F-100000 AT tower DOT york DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp_064.unm.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

----clip-----
> 
> > I've been thinking of trying to get GCC to convert memset() to rep stosl
> > as well, but I don't know how to go about doing it.
> 
> That would be a nice optimisation. Is the memcpy() an inline function in
> one of the headers? If so, which one? I can't find it anywhere...
> 

those memcpy and memmove functions are reduced to movsl's (32-bit moves) with 
optimization turned on, you can see this for yourself by compiling with the 
-S option and looking at the assembly code.

- Raw text -