Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1806
From: strider7 AT unm DOT edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ASM code & Random
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 22:47:11 -0700
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <3146615E.376F@unm.edu>
References: <1996Mar5 DOT 164831 AT zipi DOT fi DOT upm DOT es> <4hn17p$bfs AT lyra DOT csx DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <4hnjl1$1l0 AT mack DOT rt66 DOT com> <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960310091342 DOT 26365F-100000 AT tower DOT york DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp_064.unm.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

----clip-----
> 
> > I've been thinking of trying to get GCC to convert memset() to rep stosl
> > as well, but I don't know how to go about doing it.
> 
> That would be a nice optimisation. Is the memcpy() an inline function in
> one of the headers? If so, which one? I can't find it anywhere...
> 

those memcpy and memmove functions are reduced to movsl's (32-bit moves) with 
optimization turned on, you can see this for yourself by compiling with the 
-S option and looking at the assembly code.