www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <199905232219.WAA77664@out1.ibm.net> |
From: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
To: | Kbwms AT aol DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 23 May 1999 18:20:06 -0400 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | Re: New Keyword for C |
In-reply-to: | <14fa509.2479b3f4@aol.com> |
X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> _Bool > _Complex > _Imaginary > > When will gcc x.yy support these? > I don't know. I do know egcs 1.1.2 supports complex numbers as an extension (as __complex__). And it also seems to support several other features of the soon-to-be official standard as extensions, like // comments, macros with variable arguments, variable size arrays, etc. --- Mark Elbrecht, snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com http://snowball.frogspace.net/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |