Message-Id: <199905232219.WAA77664@out1.ibm.net>
From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To: Kbwms AT aol DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 18:20:06 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: New Keyword for C
In-reply-to: <14fa509.2479b3f4@aol.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> _Bool
> _Complex
> _Imaginary
> 
> When will gcc x.yy support these?
> 

I don't know. I do know egcs 1.1.2 supports complex numbers as an 
extension (as __complex__). And it also seems to support several 
other features of the soon-to-be official standard as extensions, like //  
comments, macros with variable arguments, variable size arrays, etc.

--- 
Mark Elbrecht, snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com
http://snowball.frogspace.net/