Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/05/03/07:02:39
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> > Older compiler distributions didn't have specs, and would therefore use
> > the lib/specs file from djdev.
>
> We should not have lib/specs.
Sure, I didn't mean we should include it anymore. I meant those people
who use old compilers and old libraries, where lib/specs was part of
djdev.
> We may have some file with different name which
> can be renamed back to specs in lib if user really needs it.
DJ, do you think we need to have lib/specs under different name in
v2.03? If so, what name? How about lib/specs.djg?
- Raw text -