Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 14:00:17 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: v2.03: wrapping up
In-Reply-To: <B0000085627@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990503135637.18068G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 3 May 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> > Older compiler distributions didn't have specs, and would therefore use 
> > the lib/specs file from djdev.
> 
> We should not have lib/specs.

Sure, I didn't mean we should include it anymore.  I meant those people 
who use old compilers and old libraries, where lib/specs was part of 
djdev.

> We may have some file with different name which
> can be renamed back to specs in lib if user really needs it. 

DJ, do you think we need to have lib/specs under different name in 
v2.03?  If so, what name?  How about lib/specs.djg?