Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:40:07 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal
Message-ID:	<20030122014007.GA23365@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030117120131 DOT GF1142 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20030116190119 DOT GD820 AT tishler DOT net> <20030117120131 DOT GF1142 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030121202701 DOT 007db4f0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3.0.5.32.20030121202701.007db4f0@mail.attbi.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:27:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 01:31 PM 1/21/2003 -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>Corinna,
>>
>>> but I would appreciate if you implement the appropriate setre[ug]id32
>>> calls plus the setre[ug]id wrapper.
>
>Wouldn't this (post 1.3.19) instead be the right time to kick in the 
>uid32 code? Corinna had indicated in the fall that it was "just" (my
>words) a matter of introducing a few macros to split that change from 
>the offset64 stuff?

Sure.  I plan on introducing the device file and fifo support too.
Maybe it's a good time to kick the DLL to 1.4.0 since this will be
a DLL with major new features.  Assuming all goes well, there will be
mount table changes coming soon, too.

cgf

- Raw text -