Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:40:07 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal Message-ID: <20030122014007.GA23365@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030117120131 DOT GF1142 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20030116190119 DOT GD820 AT tishler DOT net> <20030117120131 DOT GF1142 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030121202701 DOT 007db4f0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20030121202701.007db4f0@mail.attbi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:27:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >At 01:31 PM 1/21/2003 -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >>Corinna, >> >>> but I would appreciate if you implement the appropriate setre[ug]id32 >>> calls plus the setre[ug]id wrapper. > >Wouldn't this (post 1.3.19) instead be the right time to kick in the >uid32 code? Corinna had indicated in the fall that it was "just" (my >words) a matter of introducing a few macros to split that change from >the offset64 stuff? Sure. I plan on introducing the device file and fifo support too. Maybe it's a good time to kick the DLL to 1.4.0 since this will be a DLL with major new features. Assuming all goes well, there will be mount table changes coming soon, too. cgf