Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/09/06/07:51:58
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:24:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I guess my original reason for not just doing this was because I didn't
> >want to step on anyone's toes and it seems like I must have done that
> >here.
>
> And, I meant to add that I apologize for doing that. It was completely
> unintentional.
Apology accepted and not even needed. I knew that you were trying to do
good. It just didn't fit with how I've been managing the two package
sites.
> Letting someone else handle the mingw release makes
> perfect sense. I should have done it back when Earnie and I first
> discussed it. I am not sure why I didn't. I can't even claim tuit
> problems in this case. How much effort does it take to relinquish the
> reins?
>
<;^)
> Let me know if you want my scripts for creating a release. I have a version
> checked in here:
>
> cvs -d:ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel
>
I'll check this out but
> I don't have the specific modules for cygwin/mingw/w32api checked in, though,
> so I can send those or you can just roll your own.
>
go ahead and send me this. What procedures for uploading the package
are there? (I know it's been answered before but since your responding
anyway...).
> cgf
>
> >So, I'm relieved to pass this on to you. I really do think that it is
> >important that the -mno-cygwin/libstdc++ issue is resolved ASAP, though.
No doubt. As for the -mno-cygwin/libstdc++ issues, I'll see if Danny
can add something to his GCC sandbox to put together a package for
Cygwin.
Earnie.
P.S.: Did you mean to revert the add of the binary files? I didn't see
the removal come through the CVS list and the revert of the Makefile.in
sounded as if you meant to do that.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- Raw text -