Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3B97635B.39E3EC11@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 07:51:55 -0400
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: CD List <Cygwin-Developers AT Cygwin DOT Com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: winsup/mingw libstdc++.a]
References: <3B96ACB0 DOT CB3D2063 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010905194426 DOT A15906 AT redhat DOT com> <3B96BA01 DOT 945832A7 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010905195524 DOT A26502 AT redhat DOT com> <3B96C26B DOT A2919522 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010905212457 DOT A1866 AT redhat DOT com> <20010905215403 DOT A15751 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:24:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I guess my original reason for not just doing this was because I didn't
> >want to step on anyone's toes and it seems like I must have done that
> >here.
> 
> And, I meant to add that I apologize for doing that.  It was completely
> unintentional.  

Apology accepted and not even needed.  I knew that you were trying to do
good.  It just didn't fit with how I've been managing the two package
sites.

> Letting someone else handle the mingw release makes
> perfect sense.  I should have done it back when Earnie and I first
> discussed it.  I am not sure why I didn't.  I can't even claim tuit
> problems in this case.  How much effort does it take to relinquish the
> reins?
> 

<;^)

> Let me know if you want my scripts for creating a release.  I have a version
> checked in here:
> 
> cvs -d:ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel
> 

I'll check this out but

> I don't have the specific modules for cygwin/mingw/w32api checked in, though,
> so I can send those or you can just roll your own.
> 
go ahead and send me this.  What procedures for uploading the package
are there?  (I know it's been answered before but since your responding
anyway...).

> cgf
> 
> >So, I'm relieved to pass this on to you.  I really do think that it is
> >important that the -mno-cygwin/libstdc++ issue is resolved ASAP, though.

No doubt.  As for the -mno-cygwin/libstdc++ issues, I'll see if Danny
can add something to his GCC sandbox to put together a package for
Cygwin.

Earnie.

P.S.:  Did you mean to revert the add of the binary files?  I didn't see
the removal come through the CVS list and the revert of the Makefile.in
sounded as if you meant to do that.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com