Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 2 Sep 2001 20:54:17 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited
Message-ID:	<20010902205417.A17701@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<999380998 DOT 30841 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B92D324 DOT 9030308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3B92D324.9030308@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 08:47:32PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>>If anyone is around on this holiday weekend (for the US, anyway), I'd
>>appreciate it if you could take a look at the cygwin announcement below
>>and add any necessary words.  I wasn't clear on the details of some
>>of the changes, particularly Robert's pthread changes and Corinna's
>>ntsec stuff.
>>
>>I guess I'll wait until tomorrow or maybe Monday for comments.  Then
>>I'll release cygwin 1.3.3.
>
>
>Ummm...I hate to put a fly in the ointment, but has anybody tried to 
>"bootstrap" lately?  I'm running a 20010831 kernel (built under 1.3.2) 
>and I just tried to build 20010902 (fresh checkout, not cvs update).  I 
>got a signal 11 error when "Leaving directory 
>`/usr/src/cygwin/obj/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/bz2lib'
>"  (new-cygwin.dll has already been built at this point in the make).

...and the signal 11 is coming from?

cgf

- Raw text -