Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 20:54:17 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited Message-ID: <20010902205417.A17701@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <999380998 DOT 30841 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B92D324 DOT 9030308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B92D324.9030308@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 08:47:32PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>If anyone is around on this holiday weekend (for the US, anyway), I'd >>appreciate it if you could take a look at the cygwin announcement below >>and add any necessary words. I wasn't clear on the details of some >>of the changes, particularly Robert's pthread changes and Corinna's >>ntsec stuff. >> >>I guess I'll wait until tomorrow or maybe Monday for comments. Then >>I'll release cygwin 1.3.3. > > >Ummm...I hate to put a fly in the ointment, but has anybody tried to >"bootstrap" lately? I'm running a 20010831 kernel (built under 1.3.2) >and I just tried to build 20010902 (fresh checkout, not cvs update). I >got a signal 11 error when "Leaving directory >`/usr/src/cygwin/obj/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/bz2lib' >" (new-cygwin.dll has already been built at this point in the make). ...and the signal 11 is coming from? cgf