Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/04/20/21:44:45
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >J Johnston wrote:
> >As discussed, I have attached the new patch. I moved stuff around in stdio.h
> >because there were multiple sections using the same #ifdef. There were also
> >some routines that were not properly under the non-strict ANSI flag.
>
> I'm not sure if this is directed to me, but I was just asking Chuck for the
> appropriate cygwin.din changes.
>
> I decided that it was silly for me to ask him to do this since it is easy to
> do myself, though, so I've made the appropriate modifications. So, if/when you
> check this in we'll be ready.
Great -- thanks for taking care of that. One comment, though:
if the undecorated symbol is
_vscanf_r
then the decorated symbol should be
__vscanf_r
So, shouldn't cygwin.din have
_vscanf_r
__vscanf_r = _vscanf_r
Your patch has
_vscanf_f
vscanf_r = _vscanf_r
--Chuck
- Raw text -