Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3AE0E6C9.CFA716BF@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:47:53 -0400
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib
References: <3ADD0441 DOT 91F76FB6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3ADE1FC1 DOT F0A10A89 AT cygnus DOT com> <3ADE640A DOT 34E88DCE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE040FC DOT 16BD67BC AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE070F3 DOT 1C45633A AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420145228 DOT B25768 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0894D DOT 5288FDF3 AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420152744 DOT A26175 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >J Johnston wrote:
> >As discussed, I have attached the new patch.  I moved stuff around in stdio.h
> >because there were multiple sections using the same #ifdef.  There were also
> >some routines that were not properly under the non-strict ANSI flag.
> 
> I'm not sure if this is directed to me, but I was just asking Chuck for the
> appropriate cygwin.din changes.
> 
> I decided that it was silly for me to ask him to do this since it is easy to
> do myself, though, so I've made the appropriate modifications.  So, if/when you
> check this in we'll be ready.

Great -- thanks for taking care of that.  One comment, though:

if the undecorated symbol is 
  _vscanf_r
then the decorated symbol should be 
 __vscanf_r

So, shouldn't cygwin.din have
_vscanf_r
__vscanf_r = _vscanf_r

Your patch has
_vscanf_f
vscanf_r = _vscanf_r

--Chuck