From:	cgf AT bbc DOT com (Christopher Faylor)
Subject:	Re: cygwin32-developers Reply-To field
6 Feb 1998 20:25:39 -0800 :
Message-ID:	<Enzoq2.Co7.cygnus.cygwin32.developers@bbc.com>
References:	<199802041808 DOT NAA17027 AT subrogation DOT cygnus DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com
To:	cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com

In article <199802070203 DOT SAA01866 AT rtl DOT cygnus DOT com>,
Geoffrey Noer  <cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com> wrote:
>Ian asked me about the Reply-To field and whether I prefered it
>set to cygwin32-devlopers or not.  I don't have a very strong opinion.
>Maybe I slightly prefer the reply-to field because that makes the
>default be that everyone sees the responses.  In addition, with a lot
>of other lists, I frequently get two copies of responses to me, one
>from the list and one to me and the reply-to stops that.
>
>If others on the list would prefer it to be unset, I'll have it
>removed.

I have no preference.  I reply via a mail->news gateway so all of my
replies should go to the list anyway.
-- 
http://www.bbc.com/	cgf AT bbc DOT com			"Strange how unreal
VMS=>UNIX Solutions	Boston Business Computing	 the real can be."

- Raw text -