From: cgf AT bbc DOT com (Christopher Faylor) Subject: Re: cygwin32-developers Reply-To field 6 Feb 1998 20:25:39 -0800 Message-ID: References: <199802041808 DOT NAA17027 AT subrogation DOT cygnus DOT com> Reply-To: cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com To: cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com In article <199802070203 DOT SAA01866 AT rtl DOT cygnus DOT com>, Geoffrey Noer wrote: >Ian asked me about the Reply-To field and whether I prefered it >set to cygwin32-devlopers or not. I don't have a very strong opinion. >Maybe I slightly prefer the reply-to field because that makes the >default be that everyone sees the responses. In addition, with a lot >of other lists, I frequently get two copies of responses to me, one >from the list and one to me and the reply-to stops that. > >If others on the list would prefer it to be unset, I'll have it >removed. I have no preference. I reply via a mail->news gateway so all of my replies should go to the list anyway. -- http://www.bbc.com/ cgf AT bbc DOT com "Strange how unreal VMS=>UNIX Solutions Boston Business Computing the real can be."