Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CFA2D0F.9070106@netscape.net>
Date:	Sun, 02 Jun 2002 10:34:55 -0400
From:	Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT netscape DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: binutils status?
References:	<20020520212232 DOT 36691 DOT qmail AT web14505 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <3CE9C6EF DOT 5090905 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3CF67C7F DOT 5040104 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020530195752 DOT GC6608 AT redhat DOT com> <3CF68EB8 DOT 8050104 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Hi,

It was stated earlier that Ralf's "unused _nm_ symbols" patch would be 
used.  What is the story on this?
For a refresher:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00320.html

Cheers,
Nicholas

Charles Wilson wrote:

> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:24:47PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> Any comments here?  Should I submit this patch to binutils, or can 
>>> we agree and commit from here?
>>
>>
>>
>> Submit it to binutils, please.
>
>
> done.
>
> --Chuck
>
>

-- 
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. 
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop AT Netscape! 
http://shopnow.netscape.com/

- Raw text -