Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CFA2D0F.9070106@netscape.net> Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 10:34:55 -0400 From: Nicholas Wourms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Wilson CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: binutils status? References: <20020520212232 DOT 36691 DOT qmail AT web14505 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <3CE9C6EF DOT 5090905 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3CF67C7F DOT 5040104 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020530195752 DOT GC6608 AT redhat DOT com> <3CF68EB8 DOT 8050104 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, It was stated earlier that Ralf's "unused _nm_ symbols" patch would be used. What is the story on this? For a refresher: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00320.html Cheers, Nicholas Charles Wilson wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:24:47PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >>> Any comments here? Should I submit this patch to binutils, or can >>> we agree and commit from here? >> >> >> >> Submit it to binutils, please. > > > done. > > --Chuck > > -- Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop AT Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/