Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2002 19:49:44 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: new package offering: zsh
Message-ID:	<20020522234944.GA26709@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0205221612270 DOT 12767-100000 AT gremlin DOT fruitbat DOT org> <01ea01c201e8$e302d7d0$010a10ac AT bluesguitar DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<01ea01c201e8$e302d7d0$010a10ac@bluesguitar.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:32:07PM -0500, Matthew Smith wrote:
>I'll vote "yes" for this, but I do have a question: have you dealt with
>binary/text issues specific to the windows platform in your port?

zsh has historically had pretty strong cygwin support so I don't think
this will be an issue.

I would be thrilled to have this in the distribution.  I've been using
my own version of zsh for years and have been meaning to submit it
as a package.  I even went as far as incorporating it into mknetrel.

I'd be happy to have some other victi, er, person to deal with the
inevitable questions, though.

One minor question: isn't there a libncurses requirement for zsh?
And maybe a libintl-1?

cgf

- Raw text -