Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 19:49:44 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new package offering: zsh Message-ID: <20020522234944.GA26709@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <01ea01c201e8$e302d7d0$010a10ac AT bluesguitar DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01ea01c201e8$e302d7d0$010a10ac@bluesguitar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:32:07PM -0500, Matthew Smith wrote: >I'll vote "yes" for this, but I do have a question: have you dealt with >binary/text issues specific to the windows platform in your port? zsh has historically had pretty strong cygwin support so I don't think this will be an issue. I would be thrilled to have this in the distribution. I've been using my own version of zsh for years and have been meaning to submit it as a package. I even went as far as incorporating it into mknetrel. I'd be happy to have some other victi, er, person to deal with the inevitable questions, though. One minor question: isn't there a libncurses requirement for zsh? And maybe a libintl-1? cgf