Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 03 May 2002 09:34:36 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: rebasing new packages?!
In-reply-to:	<20020503025804.76154.qmail@web14501.mail.yahoo.com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20020503133436.GE3216@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.24i
References:	<3CD1DDA8 DOT 60907 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
	<20020503025804 DOT 76154 DOT qmail AT web14501 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:58:04PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> If your just talking about STL in the strict sense, you shouldn't need
> libstdc++.a.  The templated STL lives in the headers. That's the virtue of
> templated classes.  Char specializations for [Non-]Standard iostreams and
> string classes live in libstdc++.a but they are not templated pre-3.0

Does the above imply that it would easy to add STL to gcc -mno-cygwin?

Thanks,
Jason

- Raw text -