Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 09:34:36 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject: Re: rebasing new packages?!
In-reply-to: <20020503025804.76154.qmail@web14501.mail.yahoo.com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <20020503133436.GE3216@tishler.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
References: <3CD1DDA8 DOT 60907 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
 <20020503025804 DOT 76154 DOT qmail AT web14501 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:58:04PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> If your just talking about STL in the strict sense, you shouldn't need
> libstdc++.a.  The templated STL lives in the headers. That's the virtue of
> templated classes.  Char specializations for [Non-]Standard iostreams and
> string classes live in libstdc++.a but they are not templated pre-3.0

Does the above imply that it would easy to add STL to gcc -mno-cygwin?

Thanks,
Jason