Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20020429105149.02ccc968@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:55:39 -0400
To:	Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>,
	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ITP: netpbm
In-Reply-To:	<3CCD320C.5A5DA6C9@yahoo.com>
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F31 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomai <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020427180026 DOT 02cbc078 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<20020429115530 DOT B11549 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 07:44 AM 4/29/2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:04:55PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> > > But everyone will complain if they can't run the package after they install
> > > it.  I think we should absolutely avoid the latter case.  The former
> > > we can deal with as required.
> > 
> > What's the problem in adding two files to the package:
> > 
> > /etc/profile.d/netpbm.sh:
> > 
> >   PATH=$PATH:/usr/netpbm/bin export $PATH
> > 
> > /etc/profile.d/netpbm.csh:
> > 
> >   set path = ( $path /usr/netpbm/bin )
> > 
>
>Because I would `mv /usr/netpbm/bin/* /usr/bin/ && rm -rf /usr/netpbm &&
>rm -f /etc/profile.d/netpbm*'.  The point is, the extra path walks are
>expensive.



Quite true.  But I would say that Corinna's suggestion, from a strict
technical perspective, makes netpbm in a different bin directory usable
'out-of-the-box' under Cygwin.  If netpbm were going to be put in it's 
own bin directory, I would say that adding files like the ones Corinna
suggests is an absolute requirement.




Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX

- Raw text -