Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20020429105149.02ccc968@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:55:39 -0400 To: Earnie Boyd , Corinna Vinschen From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: ITP: netpbm In-Reply-To: <3CCD320C.5A5DA6C9@yahoo.com> References: <20020429115530 DOT B11549 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 07:44 AM 4/29/2002, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:04:55PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > > > But everyone will complain if they can't run the package after they install > > > it. I think we should absolutely avoid the latter case. The former > > > we can deal with as required. > > > > What's the problem in adding two files to the package: > > > > /etc/profile.d/netpbm.sh: > > > > PATH=$PATH:/usr/netpbm/bin export $PATH > > > > /etc/profile.d/netpbm.csh: > > > > set path = ( $path /usr/netpbm/bin ) > > > >Because I would `mv /usr/netpbm/bin/* /usr/bin/ && rm -rf /usr/netpbm && >rm -f /etc/profile.d/netpbm*'. The point is, the extra path walks are >expensive. Quite true. But I would say that Corinna's suggestion, from a strict technical perspective, makes netpbm in a different bin directory usable 'out-of-the-box' under Cygwin. If netpbm were going to be put in it's own bin directory, I would say that adding files like the ones Corinna suggests is an absolute requirement. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX