Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C3A3645.2C18FE83@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:59:01 -0700
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
Organization:	-ENOENT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin Apps List <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: setup.exe copyright?
References:	<20020103063839 DOT GA14473 AT redhat DOT com> <3C39E65C DOT 73827B3F AT etr-usa DOT com> <022b01c197c8$ffd00200$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>

Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> Setup.exe doesn't not require copyright assignment - it's not part of
> cygwin.

I misunderstood the contributions page, then.  I sent in my release form
because of the file type guessing patches I contributed.

Making it part of Cygwin, or at least requiring assignment to RH would
certainly resolve this question.  That is, as long as we all trust Red
Hat.  :) 

Let's face it: you're only supposed to install Cygwin and its associated
packages with setup.exe, so.....  Whoever put cinstall underneath the
winsup directory surely had the idea that setup.exe was part of the
Cygwin experience!
-- 
= ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m

- Raw text -