Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C3A3645.2C18FE83@etr-usa.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:59:01 -0700 From: Warren Young Organization: -ENOENT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin Apps List Subject: Re: setup.exe copyright? References: <20020103063839 DOT GA14473 AT redhat DOT com> <3C39E65C DOT 73827B3F AT etr-usa DOT com> <022b01c197c8$ffd00200$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: > > Setup.exe doesn't not require copyright assignment - it's not part of > cygwin. I misunderstood the contributions page, then. I sent in my release form because of the file type guessing patches I contributed. Making it part of Cygwin, or at least requiring assignment to RH would certainly resolve this question. That is, as long as we all trust Red Hat. :) Let's face it: you're only supposed to install Cygwin and its associated packages with setup.exe, so..... Whoever put cinstall underneath the winsup directory surely had the idea that setup.exe was part of the Cygwin experience! -- = ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m