Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:48:32 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: unversioned tarballs - do we need to support them (as far as prev/curr/test goes)
Message-ID:	<20011129154832.GC11595@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<055d01c1788a$bd563cd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <056d01c1788b$e28922f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<056d01c1788b$e28922f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:11:12PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Ignore this, time for a break I think.

Actually, I think it is a good question.  I have had a versioned byacc
tar ball ready to go for a while.  I'm not sure why mt doesn't have a
version already.

Unfortunately, I don't think that we can get rid of the unversioned stuff
for a while since people could still have unversioned tar balls sitting
around.  We could announce it as deprecated, though.

cgf

- Raw text -