Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:48:32 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: unversioned tarballs - do we need to support them (as far as prev/curr/test goes) Message-ID: <20011129154832.GC11595@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <055d01c1788a$bd563cd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <056d01c1788b$e28922f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <056d01c1788b$e28922f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:11:12PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >Ignore this, time for a break I think. Actually, I think it is a good question. I have had a versioned byacc tar ball ready to go for a while. I'm not sure why mt doesn't have a version already. Unfortunately, I don't think that we can get rid of the unversioned stuff for a while since people could still have unversioned tar balls sitting around. We could announce it as deprecated, though. cgf