Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/10/31/09:13:37
> severe dive, but the integer/logic performance is up. The latter
> accounts for 95% of generated code, I will go out on a limb and claim,
> but still the large drop in floating point performance is a bummer.
> This on a P2-333 system. I used the Byte-benchmark, the source code for
hello,
i just tested the experimental gcc2.96 and it was impressing!
seems to outperform old 2.95.1(gcc) by 15-20%. when compared with
the pgcc , it was just cpu dependent . 2.96 outperformed pgcc on
an amd k6/2 just only in fpu performace and on a pII in both the
integer and floating point . to be truth i didnot do much
benchmarking but these were the results i got from bytes bm
routines. and last note : 2.96 seems a bit of unstable for now -
why it is experimental- but xfree86 servers just compiled well
with it.
marc ,will we have pgcc-2.96 snaps in near future ?
Erhan Bilgili
> which is commonly available on the net.
> BTW, I have the exact same experience with bladeenc as below, but on my
> P6-cored P2-333. Can't use unroll-loops. I've removed it from my
> global config.cache and several problems cleared up in other programs.
>
- Raw text -