Message-ID:	<37BEBA27.6C0E53E0@lycosmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:39:36 -0400
From:	Adam Schrotenboer <ajschrotenboer AT lycosmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: pgcc
References:	<19990818114732 DOT 68246 DOT qmail AT hotmail DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id KAA22827
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

file will report 80386 in almost any case. AFAIK All it checks is the header
info and and such.

Guilherme Fortunato wrote:

> Hello
>
>     How do I know the program compiled with pgcc is really optimized to the
> platform I first intended it to be. I do not have another computer to test
> the executable, file still reports 80386 and I did not noticed much
> improvement in terms of speed. Also, running some tests (opengl
> applications) I noticed that the gcc program that comes with pgcc package
> most of the time produces faster code than pgcc, using the same source and
> compiler options (it also produces much bigger executables, sometimes twice
> as big, and it is not just debugging information). I have pgcc version 2.91
> (download in rpm format) and I am not in the mailing list. IŽd really
> appreciate an answer. Thank you!
>
> Guilherme Fortunato
> guilherme18 AT hotmail DOT com
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

- Raw text -