www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/07/23/16:56:38

Message-ID: <19990723205424.12628.qmail@www0j.netaddress.usa.net>
Date: 23 Jul 99 16:54:23 EDT
From: ADAM SCHROTENBOER <a DOT j DOT schrotenboer AT usa DOT net>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [Compling Kernals with PGCC]
CC: adamnorton AT hotmail DOT com
X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (M3.2.0.53)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id QAA20349
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

There's no witchcraft to making the Linux Kernel compile w/ PGCC, just get a
(stable)PGCC working, mod the arch/i386/Makefile (so that you can get the full
advantage of PGCC. The defaults are for gcc 2.7.2.3).

BTW, I have never recompiled my X servers, though I have considered it.
Probably some of the same. Also, which Linux dist do you have??? RedHat, as of
Release 6, doesn't include gcc 2.7.2.3 anymore, instead they use EGCS
1.1.2(2.91.66), and PGCC 1.1.3(2.91.66) is a patched EGCS.

Have fun.

"Adam Norton" <nortona AT aztechcon DOT com> wrote:

> --------------------------------------------- 
>	Attachment:  
>	MIME Type: multipart/alternative 
> --------------------------------------------- 
> What are the issues about compliling Linux kernals Xservers etc. with PGCC.
> Will it go out of the box? Or will I get to make changes?
> This is mainly (DOSLinux) but could apply to just about every thing.
> Does current code need to be changed to complie.
> 
> Completely new to Linux so if this is a dumb question forgive me. I know C,
C++
> from a windows stand point just have no experience.
> 
> please email me at adamnorton AT hotmail DOT com I am not on the mailing list.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adam


____________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019