Message-Id:	<3.0.32.19990719215602.010f6e70@pop.xs4all.nl>
X-Sender:	diep AT pop DOT xs4all DOT nl
X-Mailer:	Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 1999 21:56:07 +0100
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
From:	Vincent Diepeveen <diep AT xs4all DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: pgcc port for WinNT
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

At 09:37 PM 7/19/99 +0200, you wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 10:26:14AM -0500, Dustin Marquess wrote:
>> At 03:08 AM 7/19/99 , you wrote:
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >For few weeks I've compiled several
>> >version of egcs (now gcc ;-) on WinNT
>> >wihtout to much problems arising !
>> >from 1.1.2 to the latest snapshot
>> >of the new gcc-2.95,
>> >AND I have been really disappointed
>> >concerning the speed of the generated
>> >code, SINCE the Visual C++ from Micro....
>> >generates faster CODE !!!!
>> >I cannot stand it AND accept it !!!
>> 
>> 	Good luck beating VC++ on MS's own OS.  You're getting that we're at an
>> unfair advantage here.  MS knows all about the OS and ALL of it's APIs and
>> such, we don't.
>
>The OS doesn't have so much to do with this. VC++ is just pretty good
>at generating fast x86 code. Of course gcc is much better at generating
>SPARC code.

Right!

No MSVC compiler for sparc... :)

>Ronald
>
>
>

- Raw text -