Date:	Tue, 11 May 1999 00:12:43 +0200
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Optimization question
Message-ID:	<19990511001243.L22062@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 04 DOT 9905100038010 DOT 12328-100000 AT sal DOT physics DOT ucsb DOT edu> <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 990510125208 DOT 12696D-100000 AT ursa DOT cus DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <19990510202240 DOT F10032 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <19990510225936 DOT B28685 AT win DOT tue DOT nl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<19990510225936.B28685@win.tue.nl>; from Ronald de Man on Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:59:36PM +0200
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.7 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3)
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:59:36PM +0200, Ronald de Man wrote:
> But it generated a whole lot of replies on the list, and the original
> poster would have missed most of it.

Thats his problem, not ours ;) Many people are ok after they got one or
two replies and the following dicsussion might not be on-topic for them.

> Changing this official policy and making posts with a subject/body
> of 'unsubscribe' help those poor souls get off this list would have
> my vote.... :)

Well, you just have to bug DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> about it, he
manages all the lists ;)

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -