Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/04/20/16:27:03
Andrew Dodd wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Martin Kahlert wrote:
>
> > Questions on PentiumGCC
> >
> > If you have any problems installing gcc using gcc
> > or getting rid of gcc, there are a number of
> > possibilities for you:
> >
> > -(Read the FAQ. o.k. i did that)
> > -Write an e-mail to the mailing list, describing your problem
> > (and clearly stating that you
> > are NOT on the mailing list, so that people can send the answer
> > directly to you)
> Well, while people don't seem to think this list should be for subscribers
> only, something really should be done about the fact that there have been
> around 10-20 bug reports for the exact same bug every day...
>
> Does a list archive exist? In which case the steps should be, IMHO:
>
> 1) Read the FAQ.
> 2) Look at the archive to see if the bug has been reported already.
> 3) Then write to the list.
>
> And, of course, the patch should be taken down, or at least marked as
> "severely broken, no one can compile this" on the PGCC page.
This is not entirely true. I managed to compile PGCC 1.1.2 on DJGPP, twice.
What I did was patched EGCS 1.1.1 to 1.1.2, then to PGCC 1.1.2. Built it the
first w/ EGCS 1.1.2, then built it again w/ PGCC 1.1.2, no problems noted. My
guess is that the machine defs are broken in PGCC 1.1.2, but in DJGPP, the
DJGPP people wrote their own defs.
So what we need to do is check the machine defs, and fix them.
Also, has anybody tried building w/o the Haifa scheduler? (Yes, I did use the
Haifa scheduler, or at least the compile script says it has configured for
haifa, and -DHAIFA is used during the build)
- Raw text -