Date:	Sun, 14 Mar 1999 05:22:49 +0100
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Kernel
Message-ID:	<19990314052249.T21035@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<19990311215311 DOT G11562 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 9903131412530 DOT 5561-100000 AT Midnight DOT Hacking DOT in DOT the DOT land DOT of DOT Kalifornia DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.05.9903131412530.5561-100000@Midnight.Hacking.in.the.land.of.Kalifornia.com>; from David Ford on Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:18:10PM -0800
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.3 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3)
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:18:10PM -0800, David Ford wrote:
> > Inofficially, I want the kernel to work with pgcc, of course, but until the
> > current faq maintainer does hard work and sorts out all these issues in the
> > faq I'll tell all people "don't do that!".
> 
> imho, this is a clash of egos and does nothing to advance our collective
> works.

Your humble opinion is wrong. egcs always had an open ear to linus (and
still has). it has nothing to do with ego on the side of egcs. the problem
is that linus (having a very limited knowledge of compilers) thinks he
knows how egcs has to work.

If you'd follow linux-kernel you'd knew that he pissed off quite many of
his co-workers as well.

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -