www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/03/12/04:43:19

Message-Id: <m10LNon-0000G9C@chkw386.ch.pwr.wroc.pl>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 99 09:01
From: strasbur AT chkw386 DOT ch DOT pwr DOT wroc DOT pl (Krzysztof Strasburger)
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: pgcc and Mesa-3.0
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

>> > I just compiled Mesa-3.0 with pgcc-1.1.1. The package seemed to compile ok,
>> > but the resulting demos/sample files suffer from extreme rendering (or lack
>> > thereof) problems.

>On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>> Remove the -ffast-math flag.

>On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 12:30:52AM +0100, Ronald Wahl wrote:
>> add -mieee-fp to CFLAGS

>Well, -ffast-math is over-aggressive in 1.1.1, but does -mieee-fp really fix
>that problem?
Maybe yes, maybe no. In some cases -mieee-fp fixes bad fast-math, but
i experienced at least one program, where it didn't (and even
-fno-strength-reduce didn't help). Unfortunately, the program was rather
big and i didn't isolate the code, so there was no bug report :(.
Btw. I feel that the last snapshot is better than pgcc 1.1.1... There are less
errors and (a big nice surprise) the code is much smaller (version 2.93.03)
than with earlier snapshots (2.92.x) and release 1.1.x (2.91.x). What happened?
Krzysztof

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019