Sender:	plong AT mwunix DOT mitre DOT org
Message-ID:	<36DEB057.7ADD1584@mitre.org>
Date:	Thu, 04 Mar 1999 11:09:59 -0500
From:	Philip Long <plong AT mitre DOT org>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	ko, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Intel/Cygnus
References:	<000f01be6632$02e96240$3bd16482 AT ellemtel DOT se>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

David Jonsson wrote:

> This is far from trivial. The C syntax need to be abandoned if the optimization is to be transparent from the programmer, see SWAR http://shay.ecn.purdue.edu/~swar/
>
> Another approach is to use a MACRO like addition to ordinary compilers. This is what Apple has done with AltiVec wich is more promising than MMX or KNI/SSI, http://developer.apple.com/hardware/altivec/model.html
>
> How could INTEL help Cygnus? Where did you read that?

This is what I read:

http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/linuxintel990225.html

>
>
> The instruction set for KNI is available at http://www.sandpile.org/ What more does a compilerbuilder need?
>
> David
>

- Raw text -