Message-Id:	<199903021809.MAA27413@mail.mankato.msus.edu>
Date:	Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:09:02 -0600 (EST)
From:	Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey DOT hundstad AT mankato DOT msus DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.7.0 creates faster code than pgcc-1.1.1
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<01BE64C5.8B5FD140@valya.iki.rssi.ru>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

Could you try the following options:

-O20 -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer --fast-math -mstack-align-double -funroll-all-loops

Could you also report back the results with and without the -funroll-all-loops option from above.

-- 
Jeffrey Hundstad


On  2 Mar, Eugene M. Indenbom wrote:
> I make gzip using pgcc with the following oprions:
> 
> make CC="/home/ddict/glibc/pgcc-1.1.1/gcc/xgcc -B/home/ddict/glibc/pgcc-1.1.1/gcc/" \
> CFLAGS="-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -fno-exceptions 
> -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2"
> 
> This combination appears to produce the fastest code I can get on my Pentium Pro 180MHz (192MB RAM):
> 
> $ time ./gzip -cd egcs-1.1.1.tar.gz > /dev/null
> 
> real    0m7.296s
> user    0m7.170s
> sys     0m0.130s
> 
> But gzip that I get from very old Slackware distribution (1995) works
> much faster. It was compiled with gcc-2.7.0 -O2 and works more than 5% faster!
> 
> $ time /bin/gzip -cd egcs-1.1.1.tar.gz > /dev/null
> 
> real    0m6.942s
> user    0m6.730s
> sys     0m0.210s
> 
> Stock egcs-1.1.1 looses competition too:
> make CFLAGS="-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -fno-exceptions 
> -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2"
> 
> $ time ./gzip -cd egcs-1.1.1.tar.gz > /dev/null
> 
> real    0m7.571s
> user    0m7.350s
> sys     0m0.230s
> 
> I send you this fancy executable as attachment and really want to know
> how can this be, why we loose 5% of speed in the 2.9.x gcc code using
> all optimizations invented during past 4 years?

- Raw text -