Date:	Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:35:46 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Ford <david AT killerlabs DOT com>
X-Sender:	david AT Midnight DOT Hacking DOT in DOT the DOT land DOT of DOT Kalifornia DOT com
To:	"Eugene M. Indenbom" <bom AT classic DOT iki DOT rssi DOT ru>,
	"'pgcc AT delorie DOT com'" <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.7.0 creates faster code than pgcc-1.1.1
In-Reply-To:	<01BE64C5.8B5FD140@valya.iki.rssi.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.05.9903020933590.2352-100000@Midnight.Hacking.in.the.land.of.Kalifornia.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Eugene M. Indenbom wrote:

> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:58:40 +0300
> From: Eugene M. Indenbom <bom AT classic DOT iki DOT rssi DOT ru>
> Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
> To: "'pgcc AT delorie DOT com'" <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
> Subject: gcc-2.7.0 creates faster code than pgcc-1.1.1
[...]
> I send you this fancy executable as attachment and really want to know
> how can this be, why we loose 5% of speed in the 2.9.x gcc code using
> all optimizations invented during past 4 years?

arg, please don't send big attachments to the list :)

-d
-- 
 This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows NT reboot!
  Do you remember how to -think- ? Do you remember how to experiment? Linux
__ is an operating system that brings back the fun and adventure in computing.
\/  for linux-kernel: please read linux/Documentation/* before posting problems

- Raw text -