X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Date:	Mon, 7 Sep 1998 16:11:07 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Shawn Leas <sleas AT ixion DOT honeywell DOT com>
To:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Cc:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: Rebuild the kernel of Redhat5.1!
In-Reply-To:	<19980905021126.22735@cerebro.laendle>
Message-Id:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.980907160922.5362A-100000@ixion.honeywell.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
X-Status:	A
Lines:	30

On Sat, 5 Sep 1998, Marc Lehmann wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 11:21:14PM -0500, Shawn Leas wrote:
> > On 3 Sep 1998, SL Baur wrote:
> > 
> > > Shawn Leas <sleas AT ixion DOT honeywell DOT com> writes in beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 1998, Topas wrote:
> > > >> I rebuild the kernel of Redhat5.1(kernel ver 2.0.35) using pgcc 1.1a,
> > > >> and (1) the sound device can not start (2) the Xwindow can not use too.
> > > >> It works fine when I used pgcc 1.03a, what's wrong?
> > > 
> > > Building 2.0.x kernels with egcs/pgcc/gcc-2.8 is not supported, so
> > > whether they work or not is apparently a matter of luck.
> > 
> > Actually, 2.0.35 or 36 does support it.
> 
> How do you come to this conclusion? 2.0.35 definitely does not support
> gcc-2.8 yet, I don't know about 2.0.36, but I can't imagine that anybody
> fixed all the little problems with 2.0 and certifief 2.0.36 ;)

Could have sworn I saw it on the kernel list a few months back.  Wonder if
anybody could testify to 2.0.36's pgcc-ability from experience?

-Shawn
<=========== America Held Hostage ===========>
   Day 2056 for the poor and the middle class. 
   Day 2075 for the rich and the dead.
   866 days remaining in the Raw Deal.
<============================================> 

- Raw text -