X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
To:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Re: pgcc-1.1a released
References:	<199809021140 DOT GAA16837 AT indy1 DOT indy DOT net> <19980902170442 DOT 12515 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <m2g1eakvoh DOT fsf AT altair DOT xemacs DOT org> <19980903005904 DOT 30922 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
X-Face:	(:YAD AT JS'&Kz'M}n7eX7gEvPR6U1mJ-kt;asEc2qAv;h{Yw7ckz<7+X_SYeTNAaPui:e~x$
	,A=gkt*>UPL/}\a/#C~v2%ETiAY_sx;xve0yL??JWTtX_-NUzXyP38UdW#cmN1\4(X!c3m#%IbtB-3
	Z-!xpZi!`E.s{(;aP=b11"!3wQu]1j@^V|;n=B|{l<bZV1.AI`zWV%kPCnUhcgEe\(}/_kNd6,*3ZJ
	Q3o<YQ3^u;7jS=:p0--u3msQO
X-Attribution:	sb
From:	SL Baur <steve AT xemacs DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	Marc Lehmann's message of "Thu, 3 Sep 1998 00:59:04 +0200"
Mime-Version:	1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Date:	02 Sep 1998 16:16:29 -0700
Message-ID:	<m2af4iksvm.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer:	Gnus v5.6.42/XEmacs 21.0 - "Irish Goat"
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
Lines:	50

Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 02, 1998 at 03:15:58PM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
>> Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com> writes in beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl:
>> > Its based on egcs-1.1, not the prerelease.
>> 
>> You mean egcs-1.1a, right?

> No, I mean egcs-1.1. The "a" merely indicates a packaging problem,
> release 1.1a is the same as 1.1 (see the gnu coding standards for
> clarification, its a nice system if you get used to it)

O.K.  The pgcc patch applied cleanly against the egcs-1.1a tarball.

>> If I have previously installed pgcc compilers into /usr/local, can I
>> move the files in /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib into /usr/lib/gcc-lib and
>> have them work assuming the front end `gcc' program is compiled with
>> --prefix=/usr?

> It may work in your configuration, but it doesn't in general, its
> better to recompile everything with the correct prefix.

Does this refer to the configuration name?  In order to make `gcc -V'
work without having to specify `-b' I've had to make symlinks in
gcc-lib before.

Unfortunately, going back and rebuilding pgcc-1.0.3 is out of the
question.  I trust the binaries I have.  I don't need new ones, I only 
wish to be able to use them from a gcc driver installed in /usr/bin.

> (try it out!)

I will.  I recently found out I still had a functional gcc-2.7.2.3
available (convenient, if I get too afraid running Linux 2.1 kernels).

Basically I have gcc 2.7.2.3 (libc5 and libc6) and pgcc 1.0 installed
in /usr.  I have pgcc 1.0.1 and 1.0.3 installed in /usr/local, and I
wish to move the 1.0.3 installation into /usr as a backup/alternate.
I'm ready to dump 1.0 and 1.0.1.

O.K.  I'm a dummy, and not used to keeping multiple versions of gcc
around and it took me awhile to figure out how it should work and how
I wanted it to work.

Oh well.  Off to build the new beastie, for fun I think I'm going to
add f77 this time ...

Regards,

-sb

- Raw text -