X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-Id:	<3.0.32.19980712173801.0098b210@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender:	diep AT xs4all DOT nl
X-Mailer:	Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date:	Sun, 12 Jul 1998 17:38:03 +0100
To:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
From:	Vincent Diepeveen <diep AT xs4all DOT nl>
Subject:	executable speed.
Mime-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
X-Status:	A
Lines:	45

Hello,

I compared speeds between compilers for my chess program at my pentium pro
200Mhz running linux.

Speed of 2.7.2 is 10% slower than msvc++
Now the weird thing: 2.8.1 is *exactly* as fast as 2.7.2, no matter what
optimizations i give it. This is weird.

I tried a bunch of different optimizations, starting with:

   -O2 -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer --fastmath

Note that in chessprograms FPU isn't used at all. Just integer instructions.

Now bob hyatt advised me to use
   -O

This gave same result. No speed ups.

Then before that already Steffen A. Jacob told me to use -O6,

so next run was with 
  -O6 -mcpu=i686

This didn'thelp either. All about the same speed. Perhaps 0.0x% faster or
slower, but no more than that.

The normal -O2 also didn't give anything.

How comes gcc 2.8.1 which does allow pentium pro optimization and
instruction scheduling isn't faster than a 486 optimizing compiler?

Then i tried to install pgcc, but this compiler gives all kind of header
files errors. I installed it over 2.8.1 version pgcc-2.91.34
And it says so if i do gcc --version.

However it doesn't compile!

It forgot probably to replace the header files.

How to fix this, what do i need to ftp?

Vincent

- Raw text -