X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Mail-Copies-To:	never
To:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject:	Re: Failed patching egcs-1.0.3a to pgcc.
References:	<35907044 DOT DE2012D6 AT ism DOT com DOT br>
X-Face:	(:YAD AT JS'&Kz'M}n7eX7gEvPR6U1mJ-kt;asEc2qAv;h{Yw7ckz<7+X_SYeTNAaPui:e~x$
	,A=gkt*>UPL/}\a/#C~v2%ETiAY_sx;xve0yL??JWTtX_-NUzXyP38UdW#cmN1\4(X!c3m#%IbtB-3
	Z-!xpZi!`E.s{(;aP=b11"!3wQu]1j@^V|;n=B|{l<bZV1.AI`zWV%kPCnUhcgEe\(}/_kNd6,*3ZJ
	Q3o<YQ3^u;7jS=:p0--u3msQO
X-Attribution:	sb
From:	SL Baur <steve AT vmailer DOT xemacs DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	Wolf's message of "Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:19:32 -0500"
Mime-Version:	1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Date:	23 Jun 1998 19:14:13 -0700
Message-ID:	<m2pvfza6mi.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer:	Gnus v5.6.10/XEmacs 21.0 - "Uzbek Black"
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
Lines:	10

Wolf  <twolf AT ism DOT com DOT br> writes:

> Patching file texinfo/util/texi2dvi using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 failed at 332.
 ...
> Should I ignore the failed hunk ?

Yes.  It's a mispatched comment in a script that is part of texinfo
not the compiler.

- Raw text -