X-POP3-Rcpt:	mlehmann AT universe DOT sgh-net DOT de
15 Jan 1998 02:51:22 +0100 (CET) :
From:	Ronald Wahl <Ronald DOT Wahl AT Informatik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE>
X-Sender:	rwa AT goliath DOT csn DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de
To:	Francis Vidal <francis AT cody DOT usls DOT edu>
cc:	Beastium List <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: where to find libc 5.4.41
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980115023117.14777A-100000@goliath.csn.tu-chemnitz.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980115024632.19385A-100000@goliath.csn.tu-chemnitz.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
Lines:	33

On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Ronald Wahl wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Francis Vidal wrote:
> 
> > hello!
> > 
> > i've been searching sunsite and other sites for libc 5.4.41 but can't find
> > it... any hints?
> 
> ftp://ftp.yggdrasil.com/private/hjl/
> 
> > btw, i compiled egcs-1.0.1 with the pgcc 1.0.1 patch successfuly on a
> > pentium 200 MMX but i still used the old libraries supplied by redhat
> > biltmore (4.1). if i re-compile the source again with the new libraries,
> > will it improve in performance?
> 
> Yes, but maybe you won't notice it.

After rereading this I understand what you meant... If your new libraries
are compiled with pgcc they will be a bit faster. This will result in
better performance on every program using this library. If the library is
dynamically linked (the normal case) you do not need to rebuild the
program (this includes pgcc itself since it is dynamically linked
against libc).

ron

-- 
\ Ronald Wahl --- rwa AT informatik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de   \
 \ WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~row             \
  \ Talk: rwa AT goliath DOT csn DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de            \
   \ PGP key available by finger to my email address \

- Raw text -